THE national and international fuss about whether a wee lassie should lose British citizenship because of the atrocities for which she is not remotely responsible is, in my opinion, just another distraction from the political mess Britain is in through Brexit. The political leaders, on behalf of what I would call their puppet masters, have always created distractions when their backs are against the wall.
It is my opinion that when we elect prime ministers, we really elect prime lackeys of the British Establishment and of big business.
Read more: Jihadi bride Shamima Begum slams 'unjust' decision to revoke her British citizenship
That said, try if you can, to compare this wee lassie's rightly or wrongly immature beliefs, with the mindset that led to the mass slaughter, on orders of British Prime Ministers – from Margaret Thatcher through to Tony Blair – of millions of innocent citizens in the Middle East in the last 20 years, including hundreds of thousands of children under the age of five.
How can the British Establishment now have the colossal gall to divert the discourse from (a) what amounted to war crimes against innocent people at that time, unsanctioned by the United Nations Security Council, and from (b) the present Brexit, political disorder, to a young mum trying to keep two lives extant?
William Burns,
10 Briery Bauks, Edinburgh.
I WAS genuinely moved by the letter from the Rev David A Collins (February 21). Shamefully as a church-going Christian I must admit that my first reaction to the Shamima Begum case was "hell mend her". But hell doesn't mend, as we can see in all of the world's conflicts. It destroys.
I now fully agree with the Rev. Collins that we should embrace this mother and child with mature love – transformative love that recognises the vulnerability and weakness of both and also ensures that if she returns with her child that all necessary actions are taken by the authorities to protect our communities here.
Roddy MacDonald,
1 Glenmount Place, Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel