OUR collective prospects of a long retirement appear to be reducing as the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries has, for the second year in a row, cut their predictions of UK life expectancy by six months. Its statistics are, as one might expect, based on data for England and Wales but it’s a reasonable assumption that Scotland, which normally has a lower predicted age, will be experiencing a similar reverse in the trend. I would be surprised if the predicted reduction is spread uniformly through all strata of society.
It really is a sad condemnation of life in general in the relatively prosperous UK, the way we conduct ourselves as individuals and our social conditions as controlled and regulated by government that the post-war gradual increase in life expectancy has gone into reverse. Something or things are fundamentally wrong, but who will identify and change them in this era of cutbacks and austerity?
I wonder what the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) movement make of it, or in fact all those currently in productive employment who witnesses the progressive push-back of the age at which they can start to have returned to them some of the money they and their employers have invested as National Insurance payments into the state pension scheme.
Remember pension is an entitlement not a benefit, and the way things are going today's workforce one way or another are going to get less of their investment back, partly because government has already spent it.
David J Crawford,
85 Whittingehame Court,
1300 Great Western Road, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here