SOMEONE defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results each time. In which case the UK Government must be King of the asylum.
The MoD has been castigated for its failure to dispose of its obsolete nuclear submarines ("Call for inquiry as MOD spends millions on subs no longer in service", The Herald, April 4). None of the 20 boats decommissioned since 1980 at present stored at Rosyth and Devonport has been disposed of. They lie tied-up, slowly rotting away. The MoD has admitted that it has no developed plan for the disposal of the presently operating Vanguard (Trident) submarines, nor its Astute class hunter-killer support boats. A spokesman said: “The disposal of nuclear submarines is a complex and challenging undertaking”. It certainly is.
Plutonium-239 is used in the Trident nuclear warhead. Each warhead has 4kg of plutonium, making the total required around 1.6 tonnes. This is one of the most lethal substances in existence, and has a half-life of more than 24, 000 years – an insane legacy to bequeath to our grandchildren. If the ancient Egyptian had had nuclear power stations, we would still be guarding their waste. Future generations – if any there be – will curse us for our stupidity.
And what is the response from our Government? Regrets, apologies, shame? No. It presses madly on regardless with its lunatic schemes. The Vanguard submarines will be replaced by Dreadnought class boats, which will carry the new, modernised and improved version of Trident. This will give us even more of the same insoluble problems.
Unless, of course we actually use them for the only purpose they were designed for. In which case, it’s curtains for everybody and everything and there will be no one left to lament our folly.
The profound irrationality of this self-imposed intractable problem is a reflection of the innate insanity of having global destruction as a defence policy.
Brian M Quail,
2 Hyndland Avenue, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here