“I SAW the close wall come in. There were customers in the shop and they hurried out.” One of her colleagues, she added, “was near the big refrigerator against the wall when it collapsed. She tried to run for the door but must have been caught by the falling rubble.”
The woman was talking to reporters after part of a building collapsed onto the back shop where she worked in Glasgow’s Argyle Street, in late July, 1959. Initial reports said police had seen signs of a crack in the building’s close, believed to have been caused by torrential rains during the night.
A young woman of 17 who worked in the shop was taken to hospital, where she was found to have suffered shock and extensive bruising. Her two colleagues,were dazed but unhurt.
The tenant of the only house occupied on the building’s second floor said: “I heard the building settling with the creak of splitting woodwork this morning and I needed no second telling when the police warned us out.” He, his wife and others had reached the close mouth when the back of the building collapsed. Dust from the rubble followed them as they ran onto the street’s tramlines, heedless of traffic.
In Ayrshire, a thunderstorm caused the river Irvine to overflow its banks, and the towns of Newmilns and Darvel witnessed heavy flooding. Side-streets leading from the river and the main streets of both towns were flooded in places to depths of more than four feet. One Newmilns shop-owner, called from the shop to his home in Darvel, said: “When I arrived, the water was up to my knees, and when I got into the house it was just flowing through the front door and out the back.”
Floodwater also damaged stock in several shops in Stirling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here