REMINISCING with a friend who is a retired university lecturer, I found out he was extremely cynical and critical about the background knowledge of his students in the last 10 years before his departure.
This he attributed to the dumbing-down of Scottish education so that he could no longer take for granted that the students would have the necessary knowledge in their repertoire to appreciate even basic references and allusions in literature.
Reinforcing his dismay, I am sure, were two recent news reports which in fact complemented one another.
Hilary Mantel, whose final part of her trilogy on Thomas Cromwell I am still eagerly awaiting, suggested that students should not be subjected to studying Shakespeare, while Johnathan Bate's book, How The Classics Made Shakespeare, underlines the extent to which he employed classical references in his works.
Ben Jonson remarked, probably facetiously, that Shakespeare had small Latin and less Greek but his work is steeped in allusions to events and characters from those cultures.
Sadly, most of our modern students would no doubt find much of Shakespeare's work a closed book in that they have no Latin and even less Greek.
That may well explain Ms Mantel's remark and Bate's book underscores why such knowledge would be necessary to appreciate what Shakespeare wrote.
I will leave the final word on this matter to my friend, who bewailed that the Trojan War was totally unfamiliar to his most recent students and they thought Homer referred to The Simpsons.
Much has been lost with the disappearance of Classics from the curriculum, not only grammatical rigour and accuracy of vocabulary usage in various disciplines, but also the wherewithal to appreciate the classical allusions embedded in the English and European literary tradition.
We are in the midst of a new Dark Ages of education.
Denis Bruce,
5 Rannoch Gardens, Bishopbriggs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel