JACK Jones, general secretary of the Transport and General Workers’ Union, told a Glasgow rally in October 1971 that if the government were to increase old age pensions to £8 for a single person and £14 for a married couple, it would ease unemployment.
“Pensioners need money so badly,” he said at an STUC rally at the City Hall, “that as soon as they get an increase they spend it.
“This spending causes a movement within the economy which provides employment. It could provide thousands of jobs for those out of work or threatened with redundancy. This is the sort of thing we must support.”
Jones, who had been in his TGWU post for two years, said it had been estimated that it would take £1,200m to pay the increases.
The current pensions were £6 for a single couple and £9.70 for a married couple. “That,” he said of the estimated sum, “is half the money this nation spends on defence and arms. A reduction in arms expenditure should be made to give our pensioners the extra money.”
Read more:
Herald DiarySome 4,000 pensioners (right) and many trade unionists had marched through city streets to voice support for their protest.
“If this government had any real care for the elderly, or compassion, as it claimed at the general election,” declared Abe Moffat, president of the Scottish Old Age Pensions Association, “it would have been more humane to use the money given in income tax relief to provide what we ask rather than hand it to the rich, who don’t need it.”
A collection for OAP campaign funds raised £682, including £50 given by Jimmy Reid on behalf of the shop stewards at Upper Clyde Shipbuilders, and £20 from Clydebank Town Council.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here