IN 1956, Glasgow’s councillors were once again wrestling with the old problem of how best to relieve traffic on bridges in the city centre, especially the George V bridge. A bridge at Carnoustie Street and a tunnel between Whiteinch and Linthouse were in the pipeline, but neither had yet been built. Which is why the Corporation was now giving thought to repairing and reopening the vehicle tunnel under the Clyde at Finnieston, between Stobcross Quay and Prince’s Dock.
The Finnieston Harbour Tunnel consisted of three tunnels, two for vehicles and one for pedestrians (pictured); their construction between 1890 and 1893, and which cost £287,000, was the result of private enterprise. Elevators in shafts with inside diameters of 76ft raised and lowered vehicles.
After the Great War the harbour tunnel was sold to the Corporation. One account suggested that it was not a success and that the Corporation’s own nearby ferry provided considerable competition when it came to transporting vehicles across the river. For two decades the authority ran the tunnel but by 1943 the lifts were dilapidated; this was war-time, and money and materials were in short supply. The vehicle tunnel was closed but the pedestrian one continued to operate.
Read more:
Herald DiaryBailie Robert Gray had recommended in 1953, to no avail, that vehicle tunnel be reopened. Now, in May 1956, he returned to the subject. It was wasteful, he said, that a city asset that was worth between £7 million and £8 million was not being used. There were several ways, he added, of building an approach to the vehicle tunnel so that it could take cars and thus lure traffic away from the congested city-centre bridges. An outside source had put the cost of bringing the tunnel back into use at £250,000.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here