DAVID J. Crawford’s letter (‘Remarkable change in the numbers taking part in tertiary education’) observed that four out of ten school-leavers are going on to university.
Tertiary education has indeed, as he notes, “changed dramatically from what it used to be.”
Mr Crawford describes his ascent from primary to tertiary education in Himalayan terms.
If I may borrow the analogy, I can assure him that in those days, when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, when the ‘qualy’ was a right of passage and the Age of Accountability not yet upon us, it was indeed a feat to rise beyond the foothills of Academia.
In this present age however, of cross-curricular, unit-based, credit accumulation education, in which ‘statistics’ represent an absolute truth, in which a pass mark is negotiable depending on the numbers likely to fail and in which one must avoid, at all costs, any adverse impact on the confidence of the millennial student, may I suggest the approach is more that of ‘bagging Munros’.
One must hang onto the hope that at least six out of ten school-leavers will not be up to their necks in student debt.
Maureen McGarry-O’Hanlon,
Balloch
DAVID Crawford’s letter echoed my thoughts on the remarkable changes which have taken place in tertiary education over 60 years.
Having recently attended the 50th reunion of my old school (which I attended as a pupil, pre-comprehensive) we were reminiscing about the same fact that very few went to university then and it was very rare to get a first-class degree.
I am very glad that we have lifelong learning now, having recently completed an ordinary degree at the age of 67, but I do agree with David Crawford that it would seem that intellectually the human race must have evolved substantially over the years as now four out of ten school leavers progress to university.
Although I have enjoyed the learning, and am glad to have acquired this degree, it does not feel particularly special if 40% of the population are also acquiring degrees.
Nowadays, anyway, it seems that to make progress in careers everyone is expected to obtain a Masters or a PhD.
Presumably then these are the true academics.
Irene Munro,
Conon Bridge
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here