THE American evangelist Billy Graham began his 1955 Scottish crusade with a surprise Sunday-morning trip to a church in Glasgow’s Hyndland Street, on March 20, and he ended it, in the closing days of April, with open-air rallies at Ibrox stadium and Hampden Park, the latter in front of a congregation of 100,000, perhaps the largest in Scottish church history.
Speaking to journalists on Sunday, May 1, just before he returned home, Graham said his All-Scotland Crusade had been the largest evangelistic effort in history. More than 2.5 million people had attended crusade meetings and relay services, and more than 50,000 “decisions for Christ” had been recorded, he said. The six weeks had been “amazing”. It was beyond anything that he had ever imagined, and was indicative of a great spiritual hunger in Scotland. There had, he conceded, been accusations of showmanship, but showmanship did not affect the people in the little towns to which the services were relayed: they had not a person to see, but only a voice to hear.
Read more:
Herald DiaryGraham’s visit prompted a debate at Glasgow University Union, at which a motion “that this House considers Billy Graham to be an undesirable immigrant” was rejected by 190 votes to 187.
The Rev Dr Nevile Davidson told Glasgow Cathedral that one of the most remarkable things that Graham had achieved was to make religion, at least for a few weeks, the main talking-point in Scotland.
The Billy Graham website, incidentally, describes the experience of a Fraserburgh man, then aged just 19, who stepped off a bus, intending to see a movie, but was instead drawn to a church, where a crowd was listening to a relay broadcast. Struck by a “powerful atmosphere”, he gave his life to Christ that night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here