THE decision by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to spend so much time in Shetland supporting the SNP candidate for the by-election seems to have backfired as the Liberal Democrat candidate, Beatrice Wishart, romped home to win the seat easily.
Would Ms Sturgeon’s time not have been better spent tackling the growing list of Scottish problems, as the buck clearly stops with her in devolved matters such as NHS and education, both of which are struggling with ongoing staffing difficulties?
Dennis Forbes Grattan,
Bucksburn,
DROWNED out by bigger political noises down South, the result of the Shetland by-election is interesting.
The SNP hoped to win, and put huge resources and time into trying to achieve just that. Given the daunting size of the existing Liberal Democrat majority it suggests that the SNP had a real feel that it could win, otherwise it would have kept a lower profile.
In the event, the SNP juggernaut did advance but not by nearly enough. The pro-Union parties still achieved over 53 per cent of the vote, on a relatively high turnout, whilst the pro-independence vote languished at under 34%. This is at the height of prorogation, Ruth Davidson resigning and Boris Johnson under siege. The SNP will spin this as a “ victory” and is already claiming it will win next time. The figures tell another, more realistic, story.
The SNP cannot escape the fact that independence is still a vote loser, even though it tried its best to keep that word quiet throughout this campaign.
Dr Gerald Edwards,
“AND sent her hameward, tae think again” (adapted from Flower of Scotland)
The SNP are “bragging” about losing in Shetland, saying the result was “extraordinary”, but as Vince Lombardi, the US football coach, once said, “Show me a good loser and I’ll show you a loser”.
But Shetland is different. Shetland is Nordic, by ancestry and geography (the nearest railway station is Bergen). Shetlanders may prefer to unite with the Faroe Islands and Scandinavia in general rather than be part of an independent Scotland; alternatively, Shetland may prefer to remain with the rest of the UK, allied with Orkney (which could also go Nordic) and the Scottish Borders. Independent Scotland could be a rump state.
The SNP’s bullying methods, based in substantial part upon paranoia, are alienating many. The SNP much prefer international matters to domestic; distraction to doom and gloom. List available on request of domestic sources of doom and gloom.
William Durward,
Bearsden,
Glasgow
AN interesting aspect of the Liberal Democrats’ win at the Shetland by-election is how other mainstream pro-UK parties polled.
The Lib Dems took a 48 per cent vote share, with the SNP taking 32 per cent, while Labour and the Scottish Tories together achieved merely five per cent.
While Shetland has always been strongly pro-Lib Dem, it is clear that pro-UK voters largely avoided any temptation to vote Labour or Tory - and indeed if they had, the SNP may well have won.
The SNP has long divided the pro-UK vote, and ruled. In the 2021 Holyrood election, if Scotland is to avoid a nationalist majority, it is imperative that voters are as canny as Shetlanders were on Thursday. Or pro-UK parties must co-operate more formally when deciding which seats they contest.
Martin Redfern, Edinburgh
THE more that Boris Johnson meddles with the democratic process, the more people will turn to the Liberal Democrats, whose position towards Brexit and a second EU referendum is unambiguous. I was worried about the party’s long-term future after its coalition with David Cameron but its revival is to be welcomed.
James Taylor, Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel