BUILDING a bridge to Northern Ireland makes no environmental nor economic sense ("Johnson says ‘Boris bridge’ would be a snip at £15bn", The Herald, September 13). A railway, however, carrying all the freight that currently trundles in huge lorries along one of the worst roads in the UK, would be most welcome. The A75 winds through Galloway from wretched by-pass to by-pass while the railway, axed in the 1960s lies waiting to solve the problem.
It is a surely a mark of Boris Johnson’s ignorance of Scotland, his lack of vision and care for the environment, undiluted by any feedback from his newly-appointed Scottish agent, Alistair Jack, that he misses the deep irony of this latest fantastical and theatrical diversion.
Reinstatement of the railway between Cairnryan and Dumfries, with upgraded links to Glasgow, Leith, Rosyth and Dundee, not to mention Aberdeen, is exactly the sort of investment regularly made by the EU within a peripheral, but significant, independent member state.
There’s the vision: just one of the very real possibilities that lie ahead for Scotland. Westminster is not fit to govern: the incompetence and ignorance is plain for all to see and the bridge idea is just one example.
It really is time, in more ways than one, to choose another route.
Frances McKie, Evanton.
Pipe down…
YOUR report that children might sleep through a domestic fire alarm (The Herald, September 13), brought back memories of bagpipes played indoors at home at a wee “do” which roused the three young ones in a state of disorientated alarm in a wild cacophony the like of which I have never experienced in the 50 years since.
Never repeated, responsible parenting resumed after this lapse, social workers were not involved, and surprisingly, the roof remained intact.
R Russell Smith, Kilbirnie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here