A COMMON thread running through newspaper articles over recent days is the claim that "the cheapest forms of power generation are on-shore wind and solar panels " ("Time for being coy is over: Shout your love of renewables", The Herald, September 16). Whilst the statement is correct, the problem is that it is only part of cost to the consumer. There is the price of transmission and distribution plus the 11 per cent green levy to be added to the price the consumer pays for renewable electricity, raising the cost to around 16p/unit. Indeed it is noticeable that not a single MSP has responded to the claim by the CEO of ScottishPower that renewable costs mean that future price increases could mean the burden needs to be passed to the taxpayer ("Power chief warning for home owners on climate cost reality", The Herald, June 21).
In spite of the fact that the First Minister had to admit that the Holyrood pledge to eliminate fuel poverty by 2016 could not be met, the Environment Secretary then promised to ban the use of 150 TWhours of gas (4p/unit) over the next decade, thus pledging a huge increase in fuel bills/
ScottishPower estimates the current 50 TWhours of electricity needs to expand to 200 TWhours to charge electric vehicles which means a total renewable output of 350 TWhours once gas is phased out by 2026. Wind turbines are very inefficient (circa 20 per cent load factors) hence it will need 200,000 MW of renewable energy at a cost of about £400 billion.
Ian Moir, Castle Douglas.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel