MY wife (who is wheelchair bound) and I attended a concert the other night (November 14), in the Glasgow Royal Concert Hall. the event was due to begin at 7.30pm. We arrived at the GDC car park opposite the Concert Hall at 6.40.
After purchasing out parking ticket we tried to take the lift down to the street exit. Unfortunately it was not working. We waited for five to 10 minutes and decided to try the other lift only to find that it did not go down to the street exit. A further attempt at the first lift still proved unsuccessful. Eventually I spotted an attendant and explained our problem. He very kindly sorted the lift problem and we made our way across to the Concert Hall.
To gain access to our seats required the use of two lifts. The first lift took us up to the ground floor access. This lift clearly required some WD-40 as it made a lot of noise which drew everybody's attention to us.
Making our way to the second lift we discovered that it too was not working. After several minutes this too was fixed and we managed to make our way to our seats just in time for the show to start.
Going out for the evening in Glasgow is not "user-friendly" for people in wheelchairs.
Tom Lucas, Glasgow G69.
Self-defeating
THERE is a simple reason for scrapping Trident but it is usually ignored in debates on its future. The simple reason is that any nuclear attack on Moscow would result in a direct attack on Central Scotland from Trident itself. Moscow is on the same latitude as Edinburgh. Prevailing meteorological conditions would blow the fall-out westwards, hitting two-thirds of our population. Have we forgotten the effects of Chernobyl on our agriculture already? No lambs from Argyll because of contaminated grass. The fact that Trident cannot be used without US approval through Nato, ergo is not "independent", is a less scary reason but less telling.
The supporters of nuclear "deterrents" justify their position by calling the threat of their use Mutually Assured Destruction or MAD, though our nuclear scientist who worked on the Hiroshima Bomb, Dr Klaus Fuchs, was found guilty of treason for advancing the same theory and helping the Soviets to develop their own "deterrent". MAD has a somewhat different connotation today when looking at the leaders with their metaphorical finger on the button: the United States, Russia, China, North Korea, to name but a few.
Dr Strangelove, here we come.
LDM Mackenzie, Duror, Argyll.
Not so smart
IT comes as no surprise to note in your report today on smart meters rollout problems, your suggestion “that some households may be reluctant” to have one ("Rollout of smart meters aim unrealistic", Herald Business, November 15).
No doubt many people will have heard the horror stories of elderly ladies being pressurised into having one only to find that, after fitting, their central heating no longer works. I can see they are a benefit to the energy suppliers as they are saved the cost of reading meters but fail to see any benefit for the householder. I think most people realise that if they switch on the electric kettle it will use power, likewise with the cooker, convector or central heating. I certainly would not be interested in sitting looking at a little screen telling me that. A well-prepared information campaign by the govern-ment/energy companies on how to save energy within the home would be much more cost effective.
Duncan Miller, Lenzie.
Natty heat source
MALCOLM Allan (Letters, November 15) is probably right in recommending a return of the cravat on aesthetic grounds. However, cravats do not possess one of the often-overlooked properties of the necktie, that of retaining warmth. A well-tied tie keeps the shirt collar close to the neck, providing a comfortable seal that prevents the loss of warmed air from between shirt and skin. If you don't believe this, try comparing the two on a chilly day.
Dr RM Morris, Ellon.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel