IF the Labour phoenix is to arise from the ashes of its disastrous election debacle, it must find a political narrative which will sound credible to the voters it once called its own but who deserted in droves on December 12.
Instead of ideologues, it needs those like Jess Phillips and Wes Streeting at the top, people whose principles are based on reality rather than bathed in the dreams of a socialist utopia.
To reach that situation, there has to be a reform, root and branch, of the awful party electoral system imposed upon the Labour Party by Ed Miliband, who did not think through what the consequences of his flawed reformation could be.
It gave us Jeremy Corbyn, who just could not capture the imagination of the wider electorate, and John McDonnell, who gave off the vibes of humanity but offered a ludicrous manifesto likely to plunge us into a Venezuelan inflationary spiral.
Unless the Labour Party is to become no more than a postscript as an interesting experiment and interlude in the history of British politics, it has to rediscover its purpose as a political party and a sense of pragmatism to go with it.
The trade unions need to become listening posts so that the wishes and needs of its members can be translated into policies which are really and truly meaningful rather than just pie in the sky ideals.
All of that has to be relayed to the party which has fallen out of touch with those it hopes to represent.
This is now going to be serious time of retrenchment and an opportunity for realistic reflection to recover its now lost widespread support amongst the general public.
Ahead of the Labour Party are five long years it must use sensibly to restore its mojo and to reconnect with those it must persuade to vote for its time in office.
Denis Bruce, Bishopbriggs.
NOW the results of Labour’s lurch to the far left are staring us all in the face – Boris Johnson safely ensconced in Number 10 and nationalism rife in Scotland – could we ask that Labour return to the centre ground? Please give those of us who once looked to the party for hope and a pro-UK defence against nationalism a break – merely changing a hopeless leader and his retinue and retaining the same politics will be the coup de grace for the centre left and the end of Labour as party of government.
Dismissing this result as a Brexit side-effect would be suicidal.
Alexander McKay, Edinburgh EH6.
PERHAPS Scottish Labour needs a little help from history. Until 1974 its policy was that of bitter opposition to any Scottish legislature. Then that policy was changed with trade union pressure. But many senior figures in the party like Robin Cook still campaigned against any devolution. After a few years of Margaret Thatcher, most changed their minds and many became genuine converts who made a valuable contribution to achieving a Scottish Parliament.
Now with the prospect of five years of a hard-right Tory government, surely it is time for Labour in Scotland to face the reality that many of its remaining voters and, of course, a majority of younger, progressive Scots are now independence supporters and Labour is out of touch. If it did move to supporting independence as it moved in 1974, then it could also make a valuable contribution to shaping a future independent Scotland. Unless it does, it will languish on the sidelines of history.
Isobel Lindsay, Biggar.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel