OWEN Kelly (Letters, February 18) invites us to be very apprehensive with regard to decisions in government being made by unelected officials and advisers. I wonder whether or not there was the same level of outrage and concern during the period of the Blair Government (1997-2007) when Alastair Campbell, the former journalist, was acting as press officer.
Here was a man, unelected, who exercised considerable influence. He had no hesitation in using his talents in a tribal fashion to defend, at all times against all others, the actions of the Labour Party. He was very free with his opinions within government. One can go back a bit further and find yet another example of the profound influence exercised on government by the unelected. During the administrations of Harold Wilson (1964-1970 and 1974-1976) he had a Political Secretary, Marcia Williams. An aide at 10 Downing Street once observed her power "was not only exercised through her bewitching domination of the Prime Minister himself. Once launched against any human obstacle or perceived personal enemy, her frenzied tirades were very impressive and virtually ungovernable". For her services, to the surprise of many, she was eventually made a peeress, Lady Falkender.
I believe that it is entirely reasonable, in a democratic state, to continue to monitor the behaviour and influence of the unelected and to make criticisms as appropriate. However, one should not get too carried away with any excitement generated over the subject. At the end of the day, the Prime Minister and the Government which he heads will be answerable to the electorate for their policies and how they are implemented. It is clear that the recent ending of the career of the previous Chancellor of the Exchequer had the ultimate sanction of Boris Johnson and the Prime Minister is, therefore, accountable for that decision and its implications.
Ian W Thomson, Lenzie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel