By Bruce Kennedy
AS a designer of workplaces, I’m fascinated by the adaptability of millions of people around the world as they embrace the transition from office to home working, and by the growing debate as to whether or not it can, or should, be reversed when the current crisis recedes.
The dominance of face-to-face contact is being challenged by the evidence of human resourcefulness when we are compelled to collaborate at a distance. Perhaps, as we emerge from this crisis, we will be more disposed toward curtailing travel for work in response to the health emergency facing the ecosystem that sustains us.
These first decades of the new century have witnessed the emergence of dominant evolutionary forces acting on the culture of work – issues like equality, diversity and inclusion. Whilst Millennials and Gen Z are widely credited with championing these values, in truth the swing away from a culture of work rooted in bias, gender inequality, oppressive hierarchies, and inflexibility, is a welcome cross-generational shift mirroring wider societal progress.
As high streets and shopping centres are finding to their cost, we exercise choice over how we choose to spend our leisure time: we are not afraid to vote with our feet to seek-out engaging environments that support the lifestyles we aspire to follow. It’s no surprise then, that we are increasingly unenthusiastic about working for employers who consider regimented desks, flat lighting, and colourless meeting rooms, adequate to meet our human needs.
As architects, we set the direction for the design of progressive education environments, responding to consultation and pedagogical changes. Our designs fuse learning, research, and social spaces into a seamless whole, supporting a lifestyle of learning and work together, rather than discrete activities separated by place and time.
Students emerging into the world of work from these new educational environments expect workplaces to offer a similar fusion of work, personal development, flexibility and social connectivity, in spaces that are not mono-functional but offer choice. It’s no surprise then that they will not accept business as usual in the workplace when progressive movements are defining new values for companies.
A recent report by Oracle concluded that a sense of kinship, resulting in a feeling that they work in an inclusive and diverse workplace, is now more important to a younger generation than pay and benefits.
These expectations must be considered by developers and designers if the spaces they offer are to attract and retain the best talent for employers who will purchase or lease them.
BDP is supporting progressive clients like Barclays, Google, AstraZeneca and PwC to deliver workplaces that respond to the climate emergency, reflect their values, are an overt expression of their commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility, and that create people-centred places that nurture productivity and wellbeing.
The secret to the success of built and future developments like Google London at King’s Cross or Barclays’ Buchanan Wharf is, in part, thanks to the recognition that high-quality, active public realm softens thresholds that can divide isolated workplaces from common space, integrating the places in which people work with the wider city that sustains the balance of their waking hours.
The need to work from home, to maintain social distancing, causes us to reflect that we are essentially social animals – at our most effective when we collaborate with others in teams, families and communities – deserving of workplaces that inspire creativity, celebrate our collective humanity, and allow us to thrive.
Bruce Kennedy is an Architect Director, BDP’s Glasgow studio
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here