IN 1970, the Commonwealth Games in Edinburgh had been a resounding success. Forty-two nations were represented, and as the 1,600-plus competitors hugged and celebrated to the strains of Auld Lang Syne at the closing ceremony, they were dubbed the Friendly Games; when they returned to the capital just 16 years later, they were anything but.
The 1986 event was blighted from the start. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's refusal to impose economic sanctions against South Africa's apartheid regime had stoked fury; 32 of the eligible 59 nations, mainly from Africa and the Caribbean boycotted. A 33rd, Bermuda, withdrew the day after the opening ceremony. There was home-grown opposition too, and protesters made their presence felt ahead of Margaret Thatcher's attendance at the opening ceremony at Meadowbank Stadium, above.
Organisers had failed spectacularly in attempts to raise sponsorship. With weeks to go, in stepped media mogul Robert Maxwell, declaring himself saviour of the Games, and promising cold, hard cash. In truth, however, he contributed only £300,000; the eventual deficit was £4.3m.
Maxwell, a supreme showman and much else besides, had, however, galvanised proceedings. Without him, the Games might have been cancelled. As it turned out, the closing ceremony could have been scripted for him.
A gust of wind ripped the Saltire from the flagstaff carried at the head of the Scottish team by weightlifter Albert Patrick in front of the watching dignatories, including the Queen. Writing in 1991, the Glasgow Herald's Derek Douglas described what happened next: "Immediately Maxwell dashed from the Queen's side and, with the parade still progressing down the tartan track he made valiant attempts to re-unite flag and staff. That vainglorious but ultimately shambolic attempt to salvage Scotland's honour seemed somehow symbolic."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here