WHEN Viscount Muirshiel, the former Scottish Secretary of State, John (Jack) Maclay, died in August 1992, aged 86, a very full appreciation appeared in these pages.
Written by R.D. Kernohan, it began: “Viscount Muirshiel was a man of many honours, and of honour. But he lived to so ripe an age as a friend of good causes and an elder statesman beyond politics that Jack Maclay (as he was until 1964) was almost forgotten as a once formidable politician.
“He was a powerful Secretary of State for Scotland under Harold Macmillan (1957-62) but his political role never quite matched his abilities or potential.
“That owed something both to temperament and circumstances. He was a man of great integrity, drawn to politics by a sense of public duty, but he lacked zest for the coarser forms of party conflict, perhaps even (as his time as Churchill’s Minister of Transport in 1951-52 suggested) for some of the rougher dealings within Government”.
One obituary of Maclay noted his many achievements during his time as Scottish Secretary of State. “He deserves”, it read, “much credit for the number of new factories built in Scotland [including the car plants at Linwood and Bathgate] during his term of office and for the new towns which came into being.
“He also had the satisfaction of seeing construction undertaken of the Forth and Tay road bridges, the inauguration of the first nuclear power station and of the Glasgow redevelopment plan, the modernisation of the fishing fleet and important measures of rating reform, hospital building and the liberalisation of the licensing laws”.
Maclay was one of the Cabinet ministers sacked by Macmillan in the ‘Night of the Long Knives’ in 1962. His parliamentary private secretary at the time, the Edinburgh South MP Michael Clark Hutchison, later wrote that Maclay’s dismissal was “grossly unfair” and added: “Jack was the most saintly character I knew in politics”.
Read more: Herald Diary
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here