SEX offenders in one American state are no longer to be called ‘sex offenders’ after officials said the term has a ‘negative effect’.
Sex offenders are not to be called sex offenders?
‘Sex offenders’ in Colorado in the US are to be given a new label after the state’s Sex Offender Management Board - which is made up of public defenders and prosecutors and sets standards and guidelines for treatment providers - voted to change the terminology.
What are they to be called?
During a meeting last week, the Board - that had previously voted to change the term to ‘person-first language’ - voted 10-6 to replace ‘sex offender’ with ‘adults who commit sexual offences’.
Why was this on the table?
Campaigners for the change argued that the term was detrimental to rehabilitation.
Who were the campaigners?
They included Derek Logue, who addressed the meeting, saying: “Referring to me by a label for something I did half my life ago is inappropriate and downright offensive.” He argued during the meeting that the use of the term “client” would be better.
Client?
That was one of a number of options the Board considered as a replacement term, with public defender, Kathy Heffron, saying: “It takes into consideration the uniqueness of individuals who are receiving treatment.”
However?
They opted for the ‘adults who commit sexual offences’, saying: “I think this strikes a balance that honours the impact to victims and recognises the current and ongoing impacts of sexual assault but also avoids the labeling term that has negative impacts on those who commit sex offences.”
How sweeping is the change?
The new terminology will be used in professional settings - the context of the Board and the bodies it deals with, such as treatment providers - and will not see the term altered in the criminal justice system, although there are concerns by those opposed to the move that it is a step in that direction.
What has the reaction been?
During the meeting, Jessica Dotter, sexual assault resource prosecutor for the Colorado District Attorneys' Council, said: “I'm concerned that the use of person-first language generally is an intent to remove accountability from offenders and to diminish the experience of the victims. ‘Adults who commit sexual offenses' fails to convey or represent any sort of victim centered-ness.” And Colorado’s 4th judicial district attorney, Michael Allen, responded after the meeting by saying: “You can take a tiger and call it a puppy but as soon as you take it into your house, it's still going to kill you.”
Do the public have a say?
The Board have opened up their decision to public comment ahead of their next meeting in December, but Kimberly Kline, chair of the Board, said: "Research really shows us that assigning a label has the potential for negative effects in rehabilitation and since we're mandated to make standards that are backed in research, this is really the biggest reason for the change.”
Meanwhile?
The Board will not drop the “sex offender” from its own name as only the state Legislature has the right to make that change.
Elsewhere?
In Wisconsin, Dane County Sheriff Kalvin Barrett announced in August that staff will no longer refer to those in jail as 'inmates' and will instead refer to them as 'residents', in a 'pro-active approach to our criminal justice system'.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel