As imagined by Brian Beacom
FIRST thing I have to say to your readers is that I wasn’t axed as SNP leader in the House.
Yes, it’s true for weeks now I’ve seen shadowy figures behind curtains, clutching sgian-dubhs in their skinny young hands while muttering ‘Blackford’s too far up Sturgeon’s thesis, he has to go.’
Yes, I’ve witnessed Scots MPs arm wrestle over who would get my underground parking place.
And now you’re saying to me: ‘What? You didn’t see the coup coming? What are you, the Mr Magoo of Westminster? When that Young Turk Stephen Flynn announced two weeks ago that he wouldn’t be standing for your job as leader, wasn’t that a clue that it would take around two weeks for him to conveniently forget he had ever said this to be the case?’
Yes, perhaps there were more plots being hatched than you’ll find in a le Carré novel, and only last week Mhairi Black described the SNP old guard as ‘zoomers’.
But no, I wasn’t aware of my exit at all, because I couldn’t see how a multi-millionaire humble crofter – who once worked as a managing director for NatWest Securities – such as myself, could not be seen as the radical voice of our nation’s future.
Yes, I concede I have made a few mistakes along the way.
I’ve been a bit too cuddly off-stage with Boris.
I’ve worn waistcoats trying to cultivate an elder statesman aura, when I’ve all I’ve managed is to look like is Uncle Monty from Withnail and I.
And, yes, I loved to showboat, and bore the Opposition – and perhaps even my own Party – rigid by using sentences longer than Nelson Mandela survived.
But I would argue on one point; who hasn’t supported a sex pest at some point in their career?
However, I need to clear up another issue. Critics of the SNP are now saying that my sacking, sorry resignation, clearly underlines a growing trend within the Party to eat its own limbs, citing the Ash Regan recent example.
I refute this allegation in the strongest possible terms. The SNP has long been able to execute political cannibalism when required. Two words; Alex Salmond. Or another two. Joanna Cherry, whom, I hear, had to be admitted to a cosmetic surgery clinic last night to have the Joker-sized grin on her face reduced to a wide smirk.
But I leave this job after five colourful years knowing at least Nicola has always given me her full support. Except at the time of the leadership contest when I wasn’t her number one choice. She has always been with me. Until she wasn’t.
And isn’t it sad that I’m on my way up the road because I refuse to support those who believe I’m past it, and that Nicola can be a toaty wee bit autocratic?
But how can you criticise a dear friend who happens to be a deity and . . . sorry, did I hear you snore there?
Am I boring you?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel