Recent days have seen widespread protests, riots and violence spreading across the UK, some of which has been racially or religiously aggravated. But what should an employer do if an employee is involved, either through direct participation or stirring up trouble on social media?
Anyone allegedly involved in participating in or inciting a riot may be arrested and charged with criminal offences. An employer’s first instinct might be to dismiss the individual, but this would be unwise - because they may later be able to establish their innocence, or charges dropped.
However, based on how the justice system has dealt with those involved in previous riots, those charged will be unlikely to obtain bail, probably be remanded in custody and receive custodial sentences if convicted, even for a first offence.
If an employee can’t work because they are in custody, the employer must consider whether their job can be kept open. It may be argued that the employment contract has been frustrated because the employee’s imprisonment makes performance of their contract impossible.
Alternatively, employers may be able to dismiss someone fairly for misconduct or another substantial reason. They needs to consider all the facts and decide whether the employee’s conduct is serious enough to be treated as a formal disciplinary matter. I’d recommend taking specific legal advice before proceeding.
In any case, an employee who is unable to work because they are in prison does not need to be paid. In my view, someone cannot rely on the unlawful deduction from wages legislation if they aren’t paid during time spent in prison.
If an employee hasn’t been arrested, but the employer has evidence to suggest they were involved in riots or violence, they can still take disciplinary action. Similarly, an employer does not need to postpone disciplinary measures because the outcome of a prosecution is not yet known. If they have reasonable evidence to suggest that an employee has broken workplace rules or policies, or has engaged in conduct which risks bringing the employer into disrepute, a disciplinary procedure can be triggered.
Employers must follow a fair disciplinary procedure, giving the individual an opportunity to explain their conduct and any mitigating circumstances. I recommend checking your disciplinary policy to see what this says about criminal investigations.
Some of your workforce, especially black, ethnic minority or migrant staff, or religious groups may be feeling particularly vulnerable right now. It’s worth reminding all staff, therefore, of their duty to comply with your code of conduct, the consequences of making inappropriate comments on social media, your zero-tolerance approach to discrimination or harassment, and the need to treat colleagues with dignity and respect.
It’s also prudent to let colleagues know how to report any incidents of discrimination or harassment they may experience.
If staff working in towns and cities marred by these riots and violence request temporary adjustments - like working from home for a few weeks or adjusting working hours to avoid travelling alone at night - because they feel unsafe, these should be given reasonable consideration at this particularly difficult time.
Musab Hemsi is a Partner and accredited by the Law Society of Scotland as a specialist in Discrimination Law and Employment Law
Agenda is a column for outside contributors. Contact: agenda@theherald.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here