IN years gone by eccentric election candidates such as Bill Boakes and Screaming Lord Sutch added a welcome element of humour to, what were often, turgid campaigns between Labour and Conservative parties. Your article on UKIP's Gisela Allen's advocacy of beheading and flogging for criminals (Ukip's new Scots candidate backs guillotines, castration and flogging... and you should hear her view on gorillas, News, April 23) would have been similarly amusing, but in these anti-immigration/ Brexit times, it is worrying that there are probably many people who will agree with her. Mainstream parties should discount such extremists, no matter how odd, at their peril.
D Mitchell, Edinburgh
Tackling extremism is a priority and must be at the forefront however a shocking sense of disbelief occurs at UKIP leader Paul Nutall’s proposal to launch an "integration agenda" specifically aimed at Muslim women only.
Muslim women living in the UK for centuries and have never posed a threat to the values of free speech, liberty or human rights. We are instructed by our spiritual worldwide leader Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, to obey the law of the land where we stay as an obligation.
British Ahmadi Muslim women uphold remaining loyal to our nation and we are at the forefront united against extremism.
Nutall’s concern for security is a concern but targeting the dress code of Muslim women is not the solution. Working with Muslim community groups is the best way forward, as they are in the best position to educate their women on issues about veiling and security.
To impose Nutall’s integration program would be a gross error resulting in distorting ideas and perception only for political gain. Putting Muslim women at the forefront of a political agenda is not the way to eradicate terrorism but will cause divisions, to combat extremism Britain must remain United.
Navida Sayed, Hounslow
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel