Scotland has good reason to believe that the judiciary not only does an excellent job but also commands respect from the public.
Unlike other countries, there is no evidence that judges and sheriffs are in the pocket of political parties or organised crime groups.
However, even taking into account the high esteem in which the judiciary is held, this key group of public servants must also be open and transparent.
Nearly all senior public sector figures must declare their outside financial interests.
Sizeable shareholdings, directorships and heritable property must be registered and available for public scrutiny.
Judicial officer holders, however, are not required to make such a declaration. A register showing the number of recusals - where judges have abstained in cases - is available, but no list of interests.
In 2012, transparency campaigners tried to plug this loophole and their petition to Holyrood remains live after nearly six years.
Successive Lord Presidents have opposed the proposal and resisted it all the way. A resolution to the petition, one way or another, should be reached this month.
MSPs across the political divide are open to the plan, but the Government is unenthusiastic and has backed the judges.
This is not a great position for a progressive Government to take. In Norway, a country much loved by the SNP, judges are required to declare their financial interests.
Our judicial office holders should be given a chance to introduce a Norway-style scheme. If they fail, MSPs should legislate. Transparency is easy ... if you try.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here