MOVES within the SNP to scrap Scotland's centuries old blasphemy laws are to be welcomed. But what's striking is the need for Scotland's governing party to even have such a debate.
Most people will find it breathtaking that such archaic legislation remains on the statue books. In so many respects Scotland can lay claim to be a progressive and modern European democracy. Legalisation of same sex marriage, the smoking ban, as well as policies such free university tuition and NHS prescriptions, all serve as examples - as does the plan to outlaw smacking.
Yet it's hugely anachronistic that legislation remains in place, that, at least in theory, allows for the prosecution of citizens on the grounds that they insult religion.
Many of Scotland's European neighbours, including Iceland, Norway and Denmark, have already scrapped blasphemy laws. Of course, there will be those who say that bringing forward similar proposals in Scotland would be an unnecessarily exercise that would stoke up needless controversy over a law that has not been invoked since 1843.
Granted, it's unlikely a prosecution will be brought anytime, but the blasphemy investigation faced by comic Stephen Fry in Ireland last year, which was eventually shelved, should provide food for thought, irrespective of whatever cultural and religious difference Scotland has with the Irish Republic.
Blasphemy laws should clearly be scrapped on the basis that religion like politics deserves not just scrutiny, but at times, even mockery - as often satire is the best tool to hold both ideology and those in power to account.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here