JOHN Swinney has signalled an ever-decreasing role for local authorities in education and that schools and parents will be put in charge of key teaching decisions.
Speaking yesterday ahead of the SNP’s governance review launch on Tuesday, the Education Secretary said he wanted to “decentralise management” and give extra clout to headteachers.
Empowering schools would be a key part of the government strategy to close the academic attainment gap between rich and poor pupils, he said.
There would be a "presumption that decision-making must rest with schools" and the governance review would consult on the best way of delivering the change.
Swinney, who is also Deputy First Minister, said: “Our relentless focus will be on how we can build on the many strengths in Scottish education to close the attainment gap and deliver excellence and equity in our schools.
“It will also consider how we can involve parents and the wider community better in the life of schools, because we know that there is strong global evidence that greater parental and community involvement promotes children’s attainment and achievement.”
Councils, who spend 40 per cent of their budgets on education, have warned Swinney to "proceed with caution" on the reforms.
Local authorities are also furious about Swinney's plan to find an extra £100m a year for closing the attainment gap by clawing back council tax receipts.
Scottish Labour attacked SNP ministers for cutting higher education funding. Citing work by Holyrood’s independent information centre, Labour said revenue spending on higher education was now less in real terms than when the SNP entered power in 2007.
Education spokesperson Iain Gray said: “Time and again the SNP tell us that education is their top priority, only for the reality of their record to tell us the opposite.
“Scotland’s universities should be the envy of the world and the engines of long term growth in our economy but they have faced cuts ever since the SNP came to power.
He added: “Labour would protect the education budget and the funding for our universities using the new tax powers of our Scottish Parliament and will continue to make that case."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here