NICOLA Sturgeon's office initially tried to limit her oral evidence to the Alex Salmond inquiry, sources have told the Herald, despite her boasting MSPs could grill her for as long as they liked.
The First Minister said yesterday: “There is no reason I can’t sit before that committee, answer questions, fully, in detail, openly, for as long as the committee wants.”
However inquiry sources say her officials wanted her testimony to be just three hours, less than the time allotted to Mr Salmond.
They said she needed time to prepare for the weekly Covid update at Holyrood, even though this has been delegated to other ministers twice this year already.
The sources said there was considerable “push back” on the inquiry to the suggestion.
Ms Sturgeon has repeatedly said she is looking forward to rebutting the claims of conspiracy and lying to parliament made against her by her predecessor.
The disagreement happened last week, when Mr Salmond was due to give evidence on Tuesday, February 23 and Ms Sturgeon was due to give hers on Tuesday, March 2.
Ms Sturgeon’s office argued she should give evidence from 9am until noon, as she would need to work on the parliamentary Covid-19 update around 230pm.
However some MSPs raised objections, as Ms Sturgeon has missed the Holyrood updates before.
Of the seven so far this year, Ms Sturgeon has given five, and Education Secretary John Swinney and Transport Secretary Michael Matheson have given one each.
READ MORE: Salmond inquiry: SNP MSP says plotters should 'get their jotters'
In the event, Mr Salmond cancelled his February 23 appearance after some of his evidence was censored by parliament on the advice of the Crown Office, upsetting the timetable.
He is due to give evidence tomorrow from 1230 to 430pm, while Ms Sturgeon is due to give her evidence to the inquiry next Wednesday.
She is now scheduled to give evidence for around five hours, from 9 to 2pm.
The move to Wednesday means her appearance coincides with the UK budget, meaning she may avoid some of the media glare.
An inquiry source said: “The First Minister often evades questions in parliament about the Salmond inquiry, saying that she will answer any question only to the committee.
“At the same time, she provides a running commentary and calls press conference whenever it suits her.
“To learn that we might have to fit around her run-of-the-mill parliamentary schedule calls into question just how fulsome she he willing to be with us.”
The inquiry is looking at how the Scottish Government bungled a probe into sexual misconduct claims made against Mr Salmond in 2018.
READ MORE: Tom Gordon - Leaders need to focus on what matters, not Twitter
He had the exercise set aside in a judicial review, showing it was “tainted by apparent bias”, a Government flaw that left taxpayers with a £512,000 bill for his costs.
He was later charged with sexual assault but cleared of all counts at a High Court trial last March.
He has claimed the prosecution was driven by people close to Ms Sturgeon who resented his victory in the civil case and wanted to damage him and remove from public life, "even to the extent of having me imprisoned".
Asked about the meeting scheduled for March 2, the Scottish Goverment tried to talk about March 3 instead.
A spokesperson said: "These claims are categorically untrue. The First Minister’s office initially offered a five-hour slot for the First Minister to give evidence next Wednesday, from 9am to 2pm.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel