BORIS Johnson did the right thing by not sacking Matt Hancock after evidence of his affair with Gina Coladangelo was revealed, Michael Gove has insisted.
Mr Hancock, the former UK Government health secretary, resigned the day after photographs of him kissing his advisor were published by The Sun newspaper.
The Prime Minister subsequently claimed, through his spokesman, that he “considered the matter closed” after Mr Hancock apologised to him for breaking social distancing rules with the embrace inside his Whitehall office.
But the following day the married 42-year-old MP announced he was resigning.
Asked about the saga during a visit to Aberdeen, Mr Gove, the Cabinet Office Minister, said: “I think that Matt made the right decision.
READ MORE: Private emails, corruption claims and hypocrisy: opposition say Tory Government must get a grip
“I think in all of these questions, all of us have an opportunity to reflect on different aspects of the matter.
“But now that Matt has made his decision, I think we should respect that.”
Challenged about whether the Prime Minister, who was himself sacked by former Conservative leader Michael Howard for lying about an affair, did the right thing by not sacking him, Mr Gove said: “Yes”.
He added: “Matt did the right thing and the second thing that I would say is the matter now is resolved because we have a new health secretary.”
In response to another question about Mr Hancock’s conduct, he added: “Matt, to my mind, was a dedicated public servant.
“He made a mistake, but we should remember that he was one of those central to the successful vaccination program and he worked incredibly hard for the NHS.
“He’s now resigned and I think we should respect his privacy now.”
Amid security concerns over CCTV being installed in a cabinet members’ office, Mr Gove said: “I don’t think we have CCTV in my office.
“Obviously we have security measures at the door of the Cabinet Office in order to make sure that the overall building is safe.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel