A SCOTLAND Office minister has bizarrely suggested oil extracted from a field at the centre of a row over climate change could be left in barrels rather than actually used.
David Duguid, who meets the developers of the controversial Cambo field off Shetland tomorrow, said the “beauty of oil” was that it could be stored instead of consumed.
The UK authorities are currently deciding whether to let the Cambo development go ahead.
Green groups argue giving the go-ahead would undermine the UK’s presidency of the COP26 climate change summit in Glasgow in November.
The oil from Cambo could produce 132m tonnes of carbon if used, the equivalent of running 18-coal fired power stations for a year.
But ahead of talks with Siccar Point Energy, Mr Duguid, the MP for Banff & Buchan, told BBC Radio Scotland that oil taken from the project might never be used.
He said any go-ahead was to “extract” oil and gas, not its consumption and combustion
Asked if the plan was to let it “sit in barrels” not use it, Mr Duguid said: “Well, technically you could. The beauty of oil is you can actually store it - gas is more complicated to store.
“Better to have the oil and gas there and not need it, than to need it then have to import it.”
The SNP said the comment was "bizarre" and showed the Tories were "all at sea on the environment".
Nicola Sturgeon last week urged Boris Johnson to "reassess" potential oil field devdelopments, including Cambo, but stopped short of opposing it herself.
That led to the First Minister being accused of hiding behind the Prime Minister on the issue, given the SNP's fear of unpopularity in the North East over oil jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel