The two parties that are expected to determine who will become Germany's next chancellor have started talks to bridge their differences and declared that they got off to a good start.
Sunday's parliamentary election left Germany's traditional big parties effectively needing the support of the third and fourth-placed parties, the environmentalist Greens and the business-friendly Free Democrats, to take the top job after outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel's 16-year reign.
The two smaller parties decided to talk to each other first before entertaining advances from bigger suitors. While they have some common ground, they have traditionally belonged to rival ideological camps and have different approaches to issues including the economy and fighting climate change.
In recent decades, the Greens have tended toward the centre-left Social Democrats of narrow election winner Olaf Scholz. The Free Democrats have tended toward Merkel's centre-right Union bloc, which finished second under would-be successor Armin Laschet - its worst-ever result.
In identical Instagram posts on Wednesday, Greens co-leader Annalena Baerbock and Free Democrat leader, Christian Lindner, posted a picture of themselves with Baerbock's fellow Green leader, Robert Habeck, and the Free Democrats' general secretary, Volker Wissing.
"In the search for a new government, we are sounding out common ground and bridges over things that divide us - and even finding some," the posts read. "Exciting times."
They didn't say how or when they will proceed or give any other details. The Social Democrats have said they would like to start exploratory talks as early as this week.
The only other combination of parties that would have a majority in parliament is a repeat of the often bad-tempered outgoing "grand coalition" of the two big parties, which neither of them wants.
Merkel's current coalition came about after the 2017 election when Lindner pulled the plug on talks on a possible alliance with the chancellor's Union and the Greens.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here