THE Met Gala, Golden Globes, and Critics’ Choice Movie Awards are going, or have gone, fully vegan. Yet the United Nations Conference of the Parties (COP26), an event aimed at tackling climate change, can’t seem to ditch meat, dairy, and eggs. I know I’m not the only one who thinks that’s absurd.
The United Nations itself has acknowledged that animal agriculture causes nearly one-fifth of human-induced greenhouse-gas emissions and that the production of meat, eggs, and dairy is the leading cause of ocean dead zones, water pollution, species extinction, and habitat destruction.
It has also asserted that raising animals for food is “one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global”. Given the profoundly negative impact of animal agriculture on the environment, serving non-vegan food at a climate change summit is, to quote my friends at PETA, “like distributing cigarettes at a health convention”. It’s counterproductive and dangerous.
Raising animals for food requires massive amounts of land, energy, and water – and causes animals untold suffering. Researchers at the University of Oxford studied the effects of various foods from 40,000 farms in 119 countries and concluded that huge reductions in meat-eating – including reducing beef consumption to almost nil – are not merely desirable but essential to avoiding the worst effects of the climate crisis.
The lead researcher, Joseph Poore, also concluded that going vegan is “the single biggest way” for everyone to reduce their impact on the planet – much more so than flying less or buying an electric car. Another study found that a widespread switch to vegan eating would cut global greenhouse-gas emissions by at least 70% by 2050 since vegan foods have a much smaller carbon footprint than their animal-based equivalents, even if the animals are grass-fed and kept on local farms. Similar findings are echoed by every unbiased environmental study on the impact of animal agriculture.
COP26 has been referred to as the world’s “last chance” to avert climate disaster. And if the conference is to stand any chance of creating life-saving change, heads of state, organisers, and delegates must lead by example and shun animal-derived foods in favour of vegan meals. With the wide array of delicious vegan offerings available, that would be a simple matter.
Of course, leaders need not stop there. They can also use the gathering as an opportunity to discuss the adoption of policies such as taxes on animal products, financial support for farmers to help them make the transition away from raising animals for food, and initiatives to encourage schools and all other public sector institutions to switch to vegan meals. These things – and much more – must be done if we want our children’s children to have a habitable planet.
As individuals, we also have power. We can join marches and rallies and make our voices heard. We can vote for leaders who champion climate-friendly policies. And we can all take personal responsibility by ditching meat, dairy, and eggs. Our lives depend on it.
Jack Harries is an environmentalist and filmmaker. He is joining PETA’s campaign urging COP26 to serve only vegan meals. Sign the petition here.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here