IT’S an icky subject to broach given the Anglophobia and anti-Scottish sentiment fizzling away beneath the surface on both sides of the Border, but sometimes good manners and taste need to be gently elbowed aside to ask important, if difficult, questions: namely, is the conduct of the UK Government in England over Covid putting the health of Scottish citizens at risk?
England is mainly maskless. In public, most Covid restrictions, like social distancing, ended on Boris Johnson’s "Freedom Day". Scotland has retained masks and introduced vaccine passports. Mr Johnson’s Government refuses to reintroduce safety measures despite Covid running riot. Scotland continues to advise on working from home; in England there is a push to get more folk back into offices.
In Scotland, recent figures showed that one in 90 people have Covid. In England, it’s one in 55. Scotland’s infection rate has fallen, England’s is rising. Go to an English city, and it feels like a foreign country, with masks conspicuous by their absence.
It’s not a display of petty xenophobia to point out that the regulations put in place by Westminster and Holyrood are now different, resulting in different patterns of behaviour by citizens in England and Scotland. Nor is it petty xenophobia to point out that infection rates differ.
Read more: Emerging lunacies put fight against Covid in danger
It’s also true that Scotland and England are part of the same nation, the UK – there’s no border, and people move between the two countries in huge waves daily.
One does not have to be a Wittgenstein logician to see that there’s a question posed here: if all these conditions are true, then could what’s happening in England be putting health at risk in Scotland?
None of this is to say that Scotland has behaved in some marvellous, Platonic way around Covid. Until Mr Johnson’s Freedom Day, the two nations were pretty much in lockstep – the same mistakes mostly made, the same basic policies followed. The only exception is that – as we’ve now heard rightly, but ad nauseam – Nicola Sturgeon was and is a far superior communicator than Mr Johnson. She can present a case, he fumbles and burbles like a schoolboy asking to go to the toilet.
So this isn’t a matter of Scottish exceptionalism – thank God, because that vice is one of the curses of this country. Rather, it’s a matter of observing a collection of facts and noticing that they seem to – I hasten to underscore "seem to" – point in one direction: that Scotland may find itself put at risk by England.
Now, if we lived in a world where logic ruled and emotions were kept slightly more in check, we could have this conversation without mass hysteria. Clearly, unionist hardliners will see even a whisper of such a discussion as akin to the storming of Windsor Castle.
Andy Burnham, Mayor of Manchester, has already given us a flavour of this refusal to even discuss the matter. I should point out that if I lived in England I’d be clamouring for Mr Burnham to lead the Labour Party. I’d consider voting for him. So I’ve no axe to grind, as I rather admire him. However, he got matters egregiously wrong when he entered into a social media spat with a Scot who posted: “Visiting Manchester, because every now and then I must. I’m on a bus, wearing a mask. Nobody else is doing that, and some of the people are coughing. They have not even learnt to cough into their hands or elbows. Andy Burnham, don’t cry if Mancunians get banned from Scotland again.”
Clearly, the poster is both right on one hand and an irritating wind-up merchant on the other. Anyone half-sane who’s travelled to England lately finds the lack of masks worrying. Our Scottish poster, though, didn’t need to bait Mr Burnham so blatantly.
However, Mr Burnham – with his near-half-million followers – triggered a dog-pile on the poster saying: “Not having this ‘people-are-worse-in-Manchester’ type of Scottish nationalism. And I hope the vast majority of Scots won’t either.”
Firstly, to most folk in Scotland, what’s happening in Manchester, and across the rest of England, is "worse" than what’s happening up here. That’s simply a matter of fact – and masks are the key exhibit for the prosecution. However, it’s not "the people" who are "worse", it’s the London Government. Mr Johnson’s party bears the blame.
Read more: No matter how much Sturgeon denies it, the Edinburgh outbreak looks like a cover-up
Noticing the difference in regulations and behaviour is not a hallmark of Scottish nationalism. I’d sooner bury myself alive than hold the tenets of any form of nationalism – but that doesn’t mean I, and others of a similar mind, are blind to the differences in responsible government advice and public behaviour.
Mr Burnham might also note that his own party is calling on Mr Johnson’s government to bring in Plan B to tackle the rise of Covid in England. Local public health chiefs in England are breaking from Government guidance and recommending Plan B protective measures to combat the surge. Senior doctors have accused the UK Government of being “wilfully negligent” for not reimposing masks and advising the public work-from-home. The UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak – who’s probably about to inflict more austerity measures on Britain – is firmly prioritising the economy over the health of citizens.
The Johnson Government is committed to the most demented notions of libertarianism. It’s taken the concept of freedom and turned it into selfishness and stupidity. It’s not a mark of my freedom to risk infecting another human being, it’s a mark of my utter disregard for fellow citizens. Your freedom cannot impinge on mine, nor mine on yours – without that rule all freedoms vanish and tyranny comes waltzing in the door.
What’s most sinister is the sneering joy Tories seem to take in this lunatic social experiment they’re conducting. SNP MP Pete Wishart recently noted the “comic” disparity in the Commons with half of the house wearing masks, and the other not. Mr Wishart said he’d counted only 14 Tories covering their faces. In response, Jacob Rees-Mogg sneered and mocked.
With this all considered, if there’s not a question demanding to be answered about the impact of Government-driven behaviour in England on Scotland, then we now live in an era where "the question" is dead.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel