A coalition of human rights and environmental groups have attacked the focus on carbon offsetting by rich nations at COP26, accusing the process of fuelling land grabs for tree planting in developing countries.
Midway through the climate summit in Glasgow, Greenpeace, Amnesty International, ActionAid and Global Witness are calling for governments to set "real" zero carbon emissions targets.
They are joined by indigenous rights body Articulacao dos Povos Indigenas do Brasil (APIB) and research organisation the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP).
The coalition says carbon offsetting is a scam being used as a smokescreen by developed nations to avoid reining in real terms carbon emissions in their own countries.
They said demand for land to plant the trees used in carbon offsetting schemes is forcing indigenous people off their ancestral land.
Carbon offsetting will never be able to absorb the amount of greenhouse gases countries plan to emit under their current net zero plans, the coalition said.
Teresa Anderson, climate policy coordinator at ActionAid, said: "Too many of these net zero targets rely on carbon offsetting to avoid real emission cuts, providing a convenient smokescreen to hide climate inaction.
"But growing demand for offsets will drive land grabs for new tree plantations.
"There isn't enough available land on the planet to offset the pollution hiding in thousands of net zero pledges, and too many hopes rest on long-shot technologies that will probably never work."
She added: "To have a chance of averting climate catastrophe, we need to see real transformation, and emissions brought down to real zero."
Seema Joshi, director of campaigns at Global Witness, said: "The biggest polluters are using net zero promises to delay climate action.
"Far-off voluntary targets and pledges to somehow offset their impacts in the future are distractions which they hope will allow them to continue to expand production of fossil fuels."
She continued: "Net zero is not zero - if we are to have any hope of avoiding catastrophic climate breakdown, we need the big emitters to reduce greenhouse gas emissions now."
Jennifer Morgan, executive director of Greenpeace, described carbon offsetting as "an accounting trick whereby emissions are taken off the ledger of polluters".
"It's time for governments and corporations to try harder: cut the greenwash and skip scams, and focus on real zero climate action plans," she said.
Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said: "Net zero doesn't cut it. Wealthy industrialised countries must reach zero emissions much earlier than 2050 to avoid putting an excessive burden on the most climate-vulnerable countries.
"This is not simply a humanitarian issue, it's a legal obligation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel