MIGHT Christmas itself become a casualty of the age of Covid? Is this annual super-spreader event still justified or safe?
Killjoy scientists on SAGE, the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies, reportedly discussed the idea of moving Christmas to the summer, as it is already in Australia and New Zealand, on health grounds.
I suppose those who regard Christmas as essentially racist because it's white might be pleased. But I don't think Boris Johnson or Nicola Sturgeon are likely to think seriously of emulating Oliver Cromwell and cancelling our originally pagan festival of the Winter Solstice. No government would dare meddle.
But it may be that the public do it for them – after all, the lesson of Covid so far is that the public have been, if anything, in advance of government in behaviour change. It's a safe bet that “Winterval”, as some progressives like to call it, will never be quite the same again.
Christmas is likely to remain a time of anxiety rather than celebration for some years at least. That will mean at the very least a fundamental reassessment of festive hygiene. We have become more aware than ever before that Christmas is a petri dish for infections of all kinds. Between 10,000 and 20,000 people die every winter from flu and other respiratory disease. Then there are the unpleasant non-fatal infections like strep throat and winter vomiting bugs.
Our immune systems are at their least resilient in the depths of winter, yet we indulge in behaviour almost purpose-designed to transmit viruses of all kinds. All that kissing and hugging, mixing up the generations, holding boozy gatherings and travelling around the country. It may be that we end up carrying vaccine passports of one kind or another as a matter of course.
Will offices ever hold boozy Christmas parties in future? Not in Number 10 certainly. Mistletoe? forget it. Old people may find themselves increasingly isolated as people rein back on family gatherings and place seniors in a kind of involuntary quarantine. Public health warnings will become as ubiquitous at Christmas as those hideous shopping ads.
Governments and the NHS will on high alert in the run-up to future festive seasons. The Omicron variant has come pretty much from nowhere. Until last week, there was a widespread assumption that Covid wars were over bar the shouting. The press and media were obsessed with a cheese and wine party that may or may not have happened in Number 10 a year ago. This, while a potentially deadly new variant was quietly establishing itself in our midst.
Most of us are still hoping that Omicron will be mild and merely the latest stage in the evolution of this coronavirus to something like the common cold. But we have no firm scientific grounds for believing this, only anecdotal evidence from medics like the South African GP, Doctor Angelique Coetzee, who believes Omicron is a bit of a pussycat compared with Delta. The message from epidemiologists and public health experts here, like Professor Devi Sridhar of Edinburgh University, is less agreeable. They think there will more likely be a succession of Rho, Sigma and Upsilon variants emerging in parts of the world where vaccination programmes are patchy or non existent.
Read more: Vaccine hoarding: why governments will always take care of their own
Yesterday, Mr Johnson's Government suffered a quixotic rebellion over vaccine certification, as puzzling as it was irrelevant to the actual health emergency. Admittedly, there is little evidence that our existing vaccine “passports” are reliable. They have been overtaken by Omicron, which we are told can hit the double-vaccinated almost as hard as the non. But that doesn't mean the idea is wrong in principle. Booster passports are almost certainly on the cards. Certification seems to work in France and other countries.
The UK Government's Plan B is essentially Scotland's Plan A, since Nicola Sturgeon introduced vaccine certification in October. But the lesson from both regimes is that Covid-19 will always find a way of getting round attempts to contain it. Both Mr Johnson and Ms Sturgeon in her statement yesterday seem now to be putting less faith in lockdown and more in people doing the right thing. We're assured by both Boris and Nicola that Christmas has not been cancelled – yet.
We are urged to avoid mixing in groups of more than three households, except, confusingly when out clubbing or pubbing. The Liberal Democrat leader, Alex Cole Hamilton, pointed out raves are still being organised in Scotland apparently within the law. Mass vaccination centres are to be pressed into service, following lobbying by the Scottish Conservatives.
Read more: Boris is in a culture war with his own party ... and he's losing it
Businesses are not closing, though in Scotland they are being put under a legal duty to “avoid bottlenecks and overcrowding” and allow employees to work at home “when reasonably practicable”. God knows how a statute so vague could be legally enforced. Ms Sturgeon wants more help from the UK Treasury to help save businesses threatened by these incoherent new rules.
Lateral flow tests have become the new Covid passports and both Ms Sturgeon and Mr Johnson are calling for people to show negative tests when entering clubs and pubs. This is all very well, but these tests are not exactly foolproof. Reporting relies on trust and anyone can carry around one of those little white strips with the red line at C. TikTok is even advising school students on how to get a false positives by using hand sanitiser or fruit juice in the tests so they can cut classes.
We are assured that Scotland is the most vaccinated and boosted region of the UK, which is good news at least. It's not clear whether those emergency hospitals that were opened and never used last year might finally be brought into service. With the “tsunami” of infections heading our way, no one really knows. It is at times like this that you realise the governments actually know little more than the rest of us.
But faith in vaccination as the Covid killer is not what it was, that's for sure. We could be entering a new state of perma-pandemic in which ever greater restrictions are placed on our personal freedoms. And when Christmastime takes on a new and sinister resonance.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel