A SENIOR Tory MP has submitted a no confidence letter in Boris Johnson over the partygate saga.
Mark Harper, the party's former chief whip, said he did not believe Mr Johnson was "worthy" of holding office.
Speaking in the Commons, Mr Harper said: "I regret to say that we have a Prime Minister who broke the laws that he told the country they had to follow, hasn’t been straightforward about it and is now going to ask the decent men and women on these benches to defend what I think is indefensible.
"I’m very sorry to have to say this, but I no longer think he is worthy of the great office that he holds."
He also tweeted a copy of the letter he wrote to Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the 1922 committee of backbench Tory MPs, which has the power to launch a vote of confidence in Mr Johnson.
It stated: "I no longer have confidence in Boris Johnson as Leader of the Conservative and Unionist Party.
"In the Prime Minister's own foreword to the Ministerial Code, he says that "we must uphold the very highest standards of propriety".
"We live in a country where those in charge have to obey the same laws as everyone else."
My letter to @SirGrahamBrady. pic.twitter.com/cy7MEa3QyL
— Mark Harper (@Mark_J_Harper) April 19, 2022
He continued: "I voted for Boris Johnson in the 2019 Conservative leadership election as I wanted him to get Brexit done and defeat Jeremy Corbyn.
"I am glad that he achieved those things and I wanted him to succeed.
"However, having reflected on the past few months — from his attempt to change the House of Commons standards system to having been found guilty of breaking the very laws he set — I have reached the conclusion that he is no longer able to deliver the principled leadership required to take our country forward.
"Our Party still has so much to offer to our country, but sadly not under Boris Johnson's leadership.
"It is for my colleagues in the Conservative and Unionist Parliamentary Party to reflect on whether they reach the same conclusion and act accordingly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel