Scottish Conservatives have repeated calls for a public inquiry to be held into the CalMac ferries “fiasco”, making the plea five years after First Minister Nicola Sturgeon “launched” one of the vessels.
Ms Sturgeon was at the launch ceremony for the Glen Sannox ferry on November 21 2017, and at the time praised “state-of-the-art ferries” being built at the Ferguson Marine yard on the Clyde.
However neither the Glen Sannox, or the other ferry being built for Caledonian MacBrayne, the as yet unnamed Hull 802, have entered service, with the construction of the two vessels running over time and over budget.
The two ferries are currently due to be delivered in 2023 and early 2024, at a potential cost of more than £300 million, three times the initial £97 million contract.
Scottish Conservative transport spokesman Graham Simpson said: “The five-year anniversary of a ferry launch should be a cause for celebration, but that will not be happening today.
“If the SNP had not botched this process at every single turn, then islanders could have enjoyed years of seamless travel by now.
“Instead, they have had to endure years of delays which has had a crippling effect on our island communities and they have little confidence that this nightmare will end anytime soon.”
He accused senior figures in the NSP of trying to “pass the blame” for the delays instead of “taking responsibility for their monumental failures”.
Mr Simpson added: “That is why we urgently need a public inquiry to get to the truth of this fiasco once and for all.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The Scottish Government’s priorities have always been the completion of the two ferries, securing a future for the yard and its workforce, and supporting our island communities that rely on this type of vessel on a daily basis.
“We deeply regret that the vessels are taking longer and costing more than they should.
“We continue to urge Ferguson Marine to do all it can to bring down costs and meet the agreed delivery schedule.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel