ALEX Salmond ordered a new formal photograph of his cabinet after complaining the first ones were “not of adequate quality”.
The First Minister’s exacting style was evident at just his second cabinet meeting in 2007, according to files released by the National Records of Scotland today.
The minutes show the SNP leader was keen for his new government to be presented to the public in the best possible light.
The minutes of the cabinet meeting of 29 May 2007 record: “The First Minister said that the pictures of the Cabinet taken at Bute House on 17 May, and used by the press in their coverage of the first Cabinet meetings, were not of acceptable quality and asked that arrangements be set in hand quickly to secure an appropriate formal photograph.”
Mr Salmond also drummed the importance of cabinet meetings into his team.
Inviting them to approve the minutes of their first meeting a week earlier, he “reminded colleagues that he expected them to read each week’s minutes carefully, as once approved they stood as the formal and permanent record of the Cabinet’s deliberations”.
The minutes of May 29 also reveal Mr Salmond considered putting himself forward for questioning by the conveners of Holyrood’s committees, as prime ministers do at Westminster.
Recording a discussion on parliamentary business, the minutes state: “In the spirit of consensus government, the First Minister might offer to appear before the Holyrood Committee Conveners’ Group on a regular basis”.
The cabinet agreed that parliamentary business minister Bruce Crawford should convey this to his counterparts in the other parties “at the first opportunity, and should discuss details of possible First Minister attendance at the Conveners’ Group further with the First Minister”.
Mr Salmond went on to become the first ever First Minister to appear before the group - but he took more than six years, until September 2013, to do it.
“This is an historic occasion, which should be marked,” he said at the time.
It was also notable for being his sole appearance before the group, as he resigned the following year after defeat in the independence referendum.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel