SCOTLAND faces “significant challenges” in funding devolved public services long-term, including a £10billion annual shortfall, Holyrood’s budget watchdog has warned.
The Scottish Fiscal Commission said that over the next 50 years spending would need to increase because of pressures from rising costs and an ageing population.
Spending on health in particular would surge, up from around a third of the current budget to about half, or up 218 per cent in cash terms from £19billion today to £60bn in 2072/73.
The Herald is only £1 for three months.
This offer ends Friday so click here and don't miss out!
In comparison, education would grow from £10bn to £14bn over the same period, and all other spending would grow from £25bn today to £46bn in 2072/73.
Scotland’s population is forecast to fall by 8% by 2072/73, while the UK’s grows by 5%.
It means Scotland’s working age population will shrink by 17%, while the UK’s falls just 2%, worsening the mismatch in their respective economies and hitting Scottish tax revenue.
In addition, Scotland’s population of over-65s is forecast to rise by 31% over the next 50 years, pushing up demand for health and care services, while the UK’s increases by 42%.
The Commission warned this spending would run ahead of the likely increases in the funding to the Scottish Government from the UK Treasury and devolved tax revenues.
READ MORE: SNP MSP John Mason under fire over anti-abortion motion
On current trends, spending would exceed funding by an average of 1.7% per year.
However, the Commission noted this was not unique to Scotland, and the UK finances are also seen by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) as unsustainable in the long term.
The OBR has said that on current policies UK debt will reach 267% of GDP in 2071/72.
A big potential problem is that if the UK Government follows the OBR’s advice and cuts spending to make its finances sustainable, it will lead to deep cuts in Holyrood’s budget too.
“The end result is a considerably higher fiscal gap in the Scottish Government budget, with an average over the next 50 years of 10.1 per cent of total spending each year,” it said.
“This equates to around £10 billion in 2023-24 prices.
“This gap is equivalent to 26% of the average Scottish Government spending on health in each year, or 38% of average devolved income tax revenues.”
Such a gap would force Holyrood to slash its own spending or push up taxes.
Commission Chair, Professor Graeme Roy said: “The pressures of an ageing population and rising costs would occur under any constitutional settlement.
“Managing them under the current fiscal framework is a shared endeavour between both the Scottish and UK Governments.
“We hope this report can support a wider and more informed conversation about the public services available for our children and grandchildren and the tax policies necessary to sustain these.”
READ MORE: Kate Forbes: No second attempt if I lose SNP leadership contest
Deputy First Minister John Swinney today wrote to the Commission noting its work was based on the current constitutional arrangement continuing, not independence.
He said: “Scotland lacks the full range of powers required to manage the financial challenges it is likely to face over the next 50 years.
“It is our view that the current constitutional settlement is insufficient to properly tackle the long-term challenges that Scotland faces.
“I believe the challenges of an ageing population illustrate the necessity for Scotland to be independent, with full control over the economy and powers over migration.”
Scottish Labour MSP Daniel Johnson said: “This damning report lays bare the scale of the challenge we face.
“This blackhole ripping through Scotland’s finances is the result of years of economic failure by both the SNP and the Tories, and it will do untold damage to public services and household budgets if we continue down this path.
“The SNP cannot keep burying their heads in the sand about the mess they are presiding over.
“The next First Minister must make economic growth a priority, before this economic catastrophe hits home.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel