AN SNP convention on independence along with a summer of independence campaigning may have boosted the party's nervous grassroots.
The Dundee gathering on June 24 replaces the special conference that was due to take place in March on the de facto referendum but which was cancelled, along it seemed at the time, with the plan itself, following Nicola Sturgeon's resignation as SNP leader and First Minister.
Activists at the weekend were no doubt glad to learn of new efforts by Ms Sturgeon's successor Humza Yousaf to update the independence strategy, advance the party's central cause on the doorsteps and to make good some of the commitments – such as the promise to become 'first activist' as well as FM – which he made during the leadership contest.
The upbeat message on the summer campaign may have helped rekindle members' enthusiasm at a time when their party is going through its biggest crisis in 50 years, in the words of party president Michael Russell.
But there are pitfalls too for the SNP in putting independence too much at the forefront of its activities.
A series of polls have suggested it is not a priority for most voters currently and that the most urgent matters they are contending with are the cost of living crisis and the NHS.
📝 Sign up for Unspun – Scotland's top politics newsletter. Enjoy exclusive opinion and analysis from some of Scotland's best political writers and commentators sent directly to your inbox every weekday evening. Click here to sign up 👈
To be pressing the case for independence when many are worrying about how to pay the next gas and electricity bill, what to cut back on in a supermarket trip, and how long mum will have to wait for a hip replacement, risks looking out of kilter with public opinion and even a rather self-indulgent exercise in party management.
The SNP of course will make the case that independence is itself part of its solution to the cost of living crisis and tackling NHS woes, blaming Brexit for some of the problems such as higher prices and staff shortages in the social care sector.
But the big challenge for the party is that while they may have a diagnosis which many Scots find credible – especially among the 62 per cent who voted to remain – it has yet to come up with a solution that seems achievable when the prospect of independence and rejoining the EU seems to be receding into a very distant future.
Mr Yousaf and his party will have to address how to respond to soft yes voters thinking of switching to Labour on the grounds of 'why vote for you when you can't deliver what you want, when I can vote for somebody else who may help ease some of my immediate problems and prevent a new Conservative Government'.
It's an issue the SNP are going to have to tackle soon and one which is already being picked up with concern by some party members.
The dismissal yesterday of former SNP MP Margaret Ferrier's appeal against her suspension from the Commons for 30 days has brought a by-election in Rutherglen and Hamilton West one step closer with a possible timetable for the vote in the autumn.
"No one is talking about independence currently, apart from the SNP. The focus should be on good governance and the cost of living crisis," one SNP activist told me.
"I’ve been on the doors a few times in Rutherglen and Hamilton West and it’s energy bills and the NHS that come up time after time, so that’s what our campaign should be focused on, emphasising what we are doing at a Scottish Government level such as the Scottish child payment."
Another activist was more blunt: "The summer of indy campaign the FM was talking about is a total waste of time. There is no point campaigning until we have the answers to [what's seen as the] obstacles, and some sort of vision for what indy means to the person in the street. The 'obstacles' are the currency, pensions, border, EU questions."
It was no coincidence that Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was on the campaign trail in Ms Ferrier's constituency yesterday with a message to voters on...
...want to read the full article? Sign up for free to the Unspun newsletter and receive it directly to your inbox every weekday night at 7pm. Click here 👈
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel