Two of the UK's top experts on Brexit have condemned the Scottish Tories for "ad-hominem" attacks and lowering the tone of debate.
Dr Kirsty Hughes and Dr Katy Hayward yesterday launched a new report looking at the impact of leaving the EU on both Scotland and Northern Ireland and warning the process could undermine devolution in both countries. "Devolution has been seen more as an irritation than as a central concern in planning Brexit," they said.
Their paper provoked an aggressive response from the deputy leader of the Conservatives, Jackson Carlaw, who described it as "lurid".
Experts: Brexit is undermining devolution and powers repatriation is shambolic
As The Herald reported, he added: "This smacks far more of personal prejudice than any meaningful contribution to the debate and will, I am confident, be comprehensively disproved by the reality of what is actually negotiated and agreed."
The two experts in a letter in The Herald rejected what they called Mr Carlaw's "astonishing and unfounded attack". They wrote: "We are senior researchers in our fields, with decades of experience and international reputations; as such, we are happy to discuss and debate our analysis on a serious basis.
"But if politicians prefer ad hominem attacks - so contributing to a lowering of standards in public debate - rather than engaging with the substance of the issue, it perhaps suggest they do not have a substantive response to make."
Experts: Brexit is undermining devolution and powers repatriation is shambolic
Dr Hughes runs the Scottish Centre on European Relations and has specialised in the Scottish dimension of Brexit in recent years after a career working in some of the most prestigious think tanks in the UK and EU, including Chatham House in London and Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels.
Dr Hayward is a reader at Queen's University, Belfast, and an authority on some of the knotty Irish border issues arising from Brexit. She has been researching the EU's role in the Irish peace process for 20 years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel