NO ONE expects sinister pixellations and invisible electronic force fields to come up at a House of Commons inquisition. But up they came at the Partygate investigation by the Privileges Committee, an apt-sounding place for an old Etonian to find himself.
Committees are where the real work of parliaments is done. None of the theatrics of question times. And they don’t come more theatrical than Boris Johnson, the old Etonian under advisement and former Prime Minister of this parish.
As the purpose was to humiliate the former PM, I’d expected this to be more fun, with Boris immediately humiliated by sitting on a raspberry-blowing cushion.
The Herald is only £1 for three months.
This offer ends Friday so click here and don't miss out!
But the committee chair, liberal extremist Harriet Harman (Lab), dressed all in black (lacking only a cap to pronounce sentence), and with a huge chain like Boudicca’s bling round her neck, warned the assembled mob that the charges facing the guilty, sorry accused, of misleading the Hoose were right serious.
Mr Johnson understood the gravity of the situation. Accordingly, in he neither ambled nor shambled. Determinedly he strode, face grim, barnet slightly less unruly than in his heyday as top hooligan. He looked well, clear-eyed and healthy of complexion, the cares of office having fled his big, open coupon.
He looked impatient, keeping a lid on his outrage. Rumpled of the Doily had consulted the best and most cunning legal minds, or at least a baldy bloke with a big cardboard box, who sat beside him at the suspects’ table. Then Mr J took an oath “to tell the truth” – tricky – on a big brown Bible.
Proceedings proper began with his being cruelly forced to watch video of his performances at Prime Minister’s Questions. Boris looked at his watch, as we all did at the time.
He said: “I continue to apologise for what happened on my watch.” He had not – “hand on heart” – lied to the Hoose. The committee had been “manifestly unfair”, and claims that photos showed him rule breaking were “nonsense”. He had just been doing his job. No, not drinking, madam. Saying a few words to a departing colleague.
The camera may not lie but “sinister pixellations” do and, as for social distancing, in a cramped dump like 10 Downing Street you couldn’t have “an electrical force field” round every inmate.
More unfairness: no one sang happy birthday to him at an impromptu do, and the famous Union Jack cake was left unopened. “It was later discovered and eaten by my private secretaries.”
Coverage had been “so unfair”. He hoped the committee would be fair. Accordingly, it mocked the former PM with a picture of him raising a glass in toast to some pixellated heids.
Sir Bernard Jenkin (Con), a gentle but determined prober, said photies showed a lack of distancing of two metres. Boris said that, at the time, it could be one metre “with mitigations” – a new cocktail, M’lud. Presently, it became clear that he could see this distancing malarky far enough.
Sir B said a witness had heard Boris saying at one event: “This is probably the most socially undistanced gathering in the UK right now.” Quoth Mr J: “I don’t remember saying those words and I think it unlikely.”
Bernie: “But you’re not denying it.” Cunning little prober.
Yvonne Fovargue (Lab) noted that attendees at this birthday work do included his missus and her interior designer. “Why did you think this was necessary for work purposes?”
Given the occasion, Boris had thought it “a proper thing to do,” and reminded his torturers that “one of the peculiarities of Number 10 is that the Prime Minister’s family live in the building”. Awkward, right enough.
He told Andy Carter (Con): “It was regular, I’m afraid, for people to drink on Fridays.” Disgraceful. What’s wrong with Monday to Thursday?
A bout of “misremembering” had seen him confusing “the rules and the guidance”, which got rather arcane. He added: “Call me obtuse or oblivious” – oh, all right – “but they [social events] didn’t seem to be in conflict with the rules or the guidance.”
These sessions are gruelling and, as time went on, Mr Johnson began losing it a bit, averring avidly: “People who say that we were partying in lockdown simply don’t know what they’re talking about.” He told Sir Bernard he was talking “complete nonsense” and Alberto Costa (Con) that he was being “completely ridiculous”.
So not a fun occasion for Boris. Indeed, the only unintentional note of levity came when interrogator Allan Dorans (SNP) repeatedly pronounced “vestibule” like “vegetable”. Trust the SNP. Supposed to be humiliating a former Tory prime minister, and they embarrass Scotland once again.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel