CELTIC have been encouraged to renew their interest in Leon Best, the Newcastle United striker who turned down a January deadline-day move to Parkhead.
The 25-year-old has no future at St James' Park, where he has one year left on his current deal, with sources in the north-east last night suggesting Alan Pardew's side would accept a fee in the region of £1m for the Republic of Ireland internationalist, who missed out on Giovanni Trapattoni's Euro 2012 squad.
Having moved north from Coventry City when Newcastle were in the Championship, the player's wage demands – he is currently thought to earn in the region of £12,000-£15,000 a week – should not prove to be insurmountable, but it remains to be seen whether his decision to reject a loan move to Celtic in January will count against him.
Neil Lennon has made no secret of his quest for a bustling, British-style target man, and the 6ft 1in Best fits the bill in that regard. He may also be seen as a more affordable option than Scotland striker Jordan Rhodes, whose side Huddersfield Town are weighing up interest from Premier League sides West Ham United, Fulham, Everton and Reading, a factor which could push his transfer value in excess of £5m and out of the Parkhead side's reach.
Ironically, the prospects of a move for Best may be boosted by the departure of Alan Thompson from the backroom staff. The former Newcastle academy coach is thought to have counselled against the signing of the player, who himself has had his share of run-ins with the St James' Park hierarchy.
The player, however, started no fewer than 19 games for Newcastle as they finished fifth in the Barclays Premier League last season, scoring four times in the process. He has hardly featured since the turn of the year, however, due to combination of a knee problem and the sparkling form of strike duo Papiss Cisse and Demba Ba.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article