FORMER Rangers manager Pedro Caixinha has defended his decision to sign underperforming Mexican duo Carlos Pena and Eduardo Herrera.
The pair arrived at Ibrox while the Portuguese was at the helm over the summer but have failed to make an impression.
Pena and Herrera are believed to have cost the Light Blues around £5 million, but they have started just eight matches between them since the beginning of the 2017/18 campaign.
Read more: Russell Martin open to Ibrox loan move - but Rangers have made no official approach
Former Santos Laguna manager Caixinha was dismissed in October and has since returned to Mexican football to take charge at Cruz Azul.
Speaking to El Sol de Mexico, the 47-year-old explained that he wanted to bring in players he was familiar with when looking to shape his Gers squad.
“Back then, at Rangers, they took me two months earlier to prepare and to see what players we needed,” he said.
“I like to scout, but having players you know is also important. I like to bet on what I know, not on a player’s risks, not on their potential, but on what I have learned from following them for a long time.
“I had to work with Lalo (Herrera). And I say that you only really get to know people, and especially football players, when you work with them every day.
“What they say can weigh you down, but when you know more, that makes the difference. And with Gullit (Pena), I followed the same process.
“When I came to Santos, I wanted to make a move for him – I remember that in the league, Leon were flying, the next tournament was when they won the double – due to what I knew of his potential, his qualities and his personality.
“Many people look at the footballer as nothing more than a footballer.
“I look at him as a footballer, as an athlete and as a social and family being, and if I can have a connection between these three things, you have a good signing and fewer risks involved.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel