HAMILTON manager Martin Canning never feared that the club would abandon their youth set-up amid controversy over Lewis Ferguson's transfer fee.
For Canning has seen chairman Ronnie MacDonald watch countless boys' games and travel all over Scotland to see the club's youth players.
MacDonald had hinted his club might have to question whether their youth investment was worth it if Monday's tribunal over Ferguson's move to Aberdeen went against them.
In the end, MacDonald reaffirmed Hamilton's commitment to a policy which has produced the likes of James McArthur, James McCarthy and Brian Easton, while calling for transparency over the confidential Scottish Professional Football League process.
Canning said: "It's not my decision what happens with the youths and how the money is distributed, that's for the owners to decide.
"But from a footballing point of view I wouldn't think that (abandoning youth policy) would happen. Ronnie goes to every under-11s game, 12s game, 14s, 15s, 17s, 19s, he goes to them all. He is at reserve games home and away.
"He is passionate about youth development, he is passionate about getting kids into the team and helping kids to go and have good successful careers.
"He has still got a very good relationship with all the boys that have moved on, the Jameses and big Easty, and he looks after these boys and takes pride in seeing what they have done.
"So I wouldn't think this would have any impact on his commitment to youth development, but I can understand what he's saying in terms of it being more transparent in how these figures are arrived at for people who are investing money into youth development."
Neither club were able to say what the fee was for the 18-year-old's move but reports say the initial payment will be between £200,000 and £250,000.
But the award will not affect Canning's plans to add more players to his squad before the transfer window shuts.
"Not at all," he said. "I have not been involved in that process at all. We have been working away all summer and nothing has changed for us."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here