LISBON Lion Willie Wallace last night launched a withering attacking on Celtic manager Brendan Rodgers for his treatment of Daniel Arzani.
And the hero of 1967's all-conquering team even suggested the Australian winger, who he compared favourably to Jimmy Johnstone, might be better returning to parent club Manchester City if he isn't going to get a game at Parkhead.
At the time of Arzani arriving in Glasgow, Rodgers insisted the player wasn't ready for first-team football despite him doing well in the World Cup for his country and that it may take some time before the supporters saw him.
Wallace, who has lived in Australia for almost 40 years has been a huge admirer of Arzani from his days at Melbourne City and was delighted when his old club signed him.
And this is why he can't understand why Arzani has yet to figure for Celtic with no hint of a debut in the near future.
Wallace said: “Arzani is a good little player and the manager disappointed me on that one. If I was the board at Celtic Park, I'd have kicked the manager's arse out the door.
"He's telling me that it's going to be a while before he plays? Well, why are Celtic paying the wages and not Manchester City?
"Why would take him for two years if he isn't going to play in your team? You'd spend your money in a better way.
"The kid, for me, will finish up a better player than James Forrest. Arzani is quick, he takes people on and he reminds me a bit of Jinky because of that.
"He doesn't have Jimmy's trickery but he gets balls over and did really well at Melbourne City for a couple of seasons.
"So when I heard the manager say he wasn't ready, I was baffled. Why take the boy if he thinks he's not ready?"
Arzani is contracted to be at Celtic until the summer of 2020 but Wallace, one the club's greatest ever players, fears the Australian is wasting his time.
Wallace said: "If I was the lad, I’d ask to go back to City or go somewhere else to get a game. But as I always say, every coach, ever manager has different ideas. I could be 100 per cent wrong.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel