SCOTLAND'S under-fire referees were back in the spotlight yesterday as Partick Thistle manager Gary Caldwell claimed bungling officials are putting livelihoods at stake following his side's 1-1 draw with Falkirk.
Caldwell was incensed as Andrew Dallas sent off Thistle midfielder Gary Harkins for two bookable offences at Firhill, feeling that the second of those - a foul on Ross MacLean - didn't merit a yellow card.
The Thistle boss went on to label match officials arrogant, although he declined to elaborate on the post-match discussion he had with Dallas as they left the field of play.
“Every week there is bad decisions in every game we play in," Caldwell said. “It’s important for people’s lives that they get these decisions right.
“I’m not saying they can be perfect. I think the way they go about it after, the arrogance they show I think isn’t great.
“I think it needs to improve. We need to make it better because this is people’s livelihoods at stake in these games.
“I don’t understand how every foul we make is a yellow card, yet they get away with one, two, three fouls. I think he got sucked in today.
“I had a quiet word with the referee after the game, but I can’t say what he said. It’s private."
The controversy at Firhill is the latest in a string of high-profile incidents involving match officials in Scotland.
Dallas was at the centre of another storm as he awarded a highly controversial penalty to St Johnstone against Hearts, and Tynecastle manager Craig Levein received a one-match ban for comments about referee Bobby Madden after a defeat to Rangers.
Celtic also issued a statement after referee John Beaton decided not to send off Rangers striker Alfredo Morelos in the recent Old Firm game, with the official subsequently calling in police after receiving threats towards both himself and his family.
Meanwhile, Caldwell said he was unaware of coins being thrown in his direction from the Falkirk end during yesterday's match.
A Firhill steward reported coins being thrown at the 36-year-old from the Colin Weir Stand behind the dugouts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel