ALEX McLeish revealed he tried to use the Scotland rugby team’s comeback against England in a desperate bid to get his team back into their European qualifier against Kazakhstan.
McLeish’s men were 2-0 down after a woeful 45 minutes but nothing he nor his coaching staff said could change the course of the game. The Scots lost the third goal not long into the second-half and the game was gone.
The Scotland manager said: “We brought up the rugby team at half-time and tried to use that as an example. We said it was time to roll the sleeves up and get a grip on the game.
“I believe if we scored one then we could get another. But the Kazak team were on fire tonight.
“It was horrible. Ollie Burke looked a little bit up for it and a couple of times Stuart Armstrong made penetrating runs ... and then they hit us with two blockbusters and it was difficult.
READ MORE: Kazakhstan 3 Scotland 0: Alex McLeish's men crash to humiliating defeat in Euro 2020 opener
"It was disappointing not to see a great reaction to that. They were first to the second balls, were sharper on the night and unfortunately we didn’t get up to speed.”
“It was an extremely important game. It’s the first so there are a lot of games to go but this wasn’t how we wanted to start. They are below us in the rankings so on paper we should beat them, but they took advantage of our inability to get on the second balls, pass and we took too many touches.”
Asked if he was under more pressure because some supporters were calling this the worst result in Scotland history,” McLeish said: “Possibly. It’s a sore one but you have to give a little bit of credit to the Kazakh team for taking advantage of us.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel