Aberdeen manager Derek McInnes last night admitted there had been another transfer bid for his star defender Scott McKenna with Championship clubs Queen’s Park Rangers and Nottingham Forest still keen to lure the player south.
But McInnes, both relieved and delighted his side navigated their way to a punishing 3-2 win over Hearts at Pittodrie, revealed the offers didn’t match the undisclosed sum the Dons seek.
“There was a fresh offer,” he said. “I don’t know if there was a written offer from Nottingham Forest but there certainly was from QPR on Friday and clearly it was not enough. It was a slight increase [on the reported £3m offer last week]and it was structured in a certain way but it was not enough for the club to accept.
“Scott’s had a lot to contend with but his performances have been great. It’s up to the buying club to make my chairman think differently but as it stands Scott will remain with us.”
McInnes, who’ll lead his men into a Europa League third round qualifier against HRK Rijeka in Croatia on Thursday, described the encounter with the Jambos as “a cracking game” after their 5-0 win in last Thursday Europa League tie against Chikhura Sachkhere, won without injured defenders Mikey Devlin, Ash Taylor and midfielder Craig Bryson.
“We had quality, speed and we got their goal when Sam took advantage of hesitation and supplied a nice finish.
“When we play Hearts it’s often stop start. You could see the strength of the Hearts squad with Steven Naismith and Conor Washington coming off the bench. Naismith did what he’s done all his career and gambled and scored.”
For hearts boss Craig Levein, there was little to be cheerful about after his team surrendered a 2-1 lead late in the game.
“I find it difficult to be positive about the future when I am sitting here feeling like I’ve been punched in the guts,” he said.
“We’ve been beaten but we did not deserve to lose the match. We did enough to get a draw. We were on top until the sending off.
“There was plenty going on today that’s for sure. We should be talking about the good things we did rather than ruing some of our decision making.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here