NEIL LENNON has praised the performance of referee John Beaton in Celtic’s nerve-wracking Betfred Cup match against Dunfermline at Parkhead on Saturday.
Tom Boyd, the former Celtic captain and current club ambassador, caused an outcry at the weekend for his controversial remarks about Beaton on official channel Celtic TV.
Co-commentator Boyd was incensed when Beaton failed to award the home team a penalty in injury-time when a visiting player appeared to handle the ball inside his own area.
“He'll probably be welcomed down his pub tonight again,” he said. “I'm mystified. I'm not mystified. John Beaton as though it was a pre-meditated decision not to give that penalty because it was so late in the game, I'm not sure.
"It's come off his arm. Regardless of players down or whatever, he's not given a drop ball. So he's seen it hit the hand of the Dunfermline player and it should be a penalty. Outrageous decision from John Beaton.
READ MORE: Neil Lennon hits back at "unfair" criticism of Celtic chief executive Peter Lawwell
"We've not played well, but once again a decision from a referee may cost us in this game, hopefully we'll go on and beat not the 10 men, not the 11 men of Dunfermline, but the 12 men."
SFA compliance officer Clare Whyte is examining Boyd’s comments as clubs are prohibited from accusing a match official of bias.
Lennon, whose team won the game 2-1 thanks to a late James Forrest goal, felt that Celtic should have been awarded a spot kick.
However, he downplayed the incident and revealed that he had been impressed with how Beaton had handled the cup tie.
"I've only just heard about it,” he said. "It's probably something out of nothing, but Boydy is big enough and ugly enough to look after himself on that one.
"With the incident, I thought it was handball, but that's just my opinion. But we didn't make anything of it. It's no problem. I thought he had a good game, John, overall."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel