FOR almost two years, Polly Swann’s exercise regime consisted of a brisk cycle from her flat in Edinburgh to whichever hospital served as her educational base on that particular day.
It was a radical shift for someone who previously had tortured herself to expand her lung capacity to super-human volume, a necessary trait when rowing relentlessly for 2000 metres.
Such endeavours brought the reward of an Olympic silver medal in Rio three summers ago as part of the British eights crew. Two days later, Swann left the agony behind as she effectively retired to complete her degree in medicine.
“I got very unfit,” says the 31-year-old, without any serious regret.
Colleagues, her boyfriend, had skipped away and she appeared content.
“It’s not that I wasn’t enjoying my new life,” the Scot says. “But I’d been looking up results to see how everyone was getting on. I never properly switched off and I really couldn’t put it to bed.
“The frustration was that I know that in Rio, we had a great result. I was really happy with the process and the medal. But I thought I could still do better. I probably wasn’t in my peak state of fitness, or rowing as well as I can do. That’s maybe what spurred me on, knowing I could do better. You’ve only got your body once so I thought I should go for it now because I can’t make a comeback when I’m 45.”
So Swann is back in a boat again, with a degree in her bag, and an oar in her hand. The world championships begin in Poznan today and after a rapid re-integration into the fold, she has been thrown in at the deep end in the fours. It is a new group, with an old hand still feeling her way back.
She claimed a world title in 2013 and that set a benchmark.
“Once you’ve won one, you think that’s the level and that’s what you want,” she says. “I’m also realistic. Primarily, the goal is Olympic qualification.”
The addictive hunger for success has been reignited and ward rounds must wait while she soothes this itch.
“It’s quite a cool life and it’s quite exciting,” Swann says. “Sometimes as athletes, we take that for granted. It’s pressurised and it’s hard but it’s also a great privilege.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here