MARK Wotte, the former SFA performance director, has warned his previous paymasters that it will be a disaster for the future of Scottish football if the association’s network of performance schools is disbanded. The SFA board are embarking upon a root-and-branch review of the scheme, which costs around £700,000 per annum, with one line of thinking being that the governing body are attempting to do too much and should leave youth development in the hands of the clubs.
Now at Al Wahda in Abu Dhabi, the Dutchman who was instrumental in establishing the scheme after his arrival in post in 2011 told Herald and Times Sport that the scheme has proved its worth. The likes of Chelsea’s Billy Gilmour, Liam Morrison of Bayern Munich and Harry Cochrane of Hearts are among players to have benefited from this part of the pathway, which sees extra football lessons built into timetable of hand picked pupils at schools in Aberdeen, Dundee, Motherwell, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Falkirk and Kilmarnock.
“When I arrived in Scotland it was 2011 and I always said that it was a long -term prospect that we could bear the fruits of in 2020, when the boys are 20,” said Wotte. “Everyone at the SFA has invested a lot of time, money, effort and commitment to the development of youth over that period. Of course, you need the co-operation of the clubs because when they are 16 they leave the performance school and they go into the clubs programme.
“But I haven’t seen another project like this anywhere else in the world, and I have travelled a lot in the last eight or nine years,” he added. “If they were to shut down the programme, that would be a disaster for the future of Scottish football.
“Everyone has seen there are a lot of youngsters with a performance school background who have made first-team debuts with clubs - there is a player playing for Chelsea at the moment too, so that is a fantastic achievement. It is like a journey. If you are halfway through, you can have a review, no problem. But if you are nearly at the finish and you shut it down you are wasting a lot of money.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel